The Unwritten Rules of History

Category: Editorials (Page 2 of 3)

Teaching in Comfort and Style in Post-Secondary Education

Image of a wooden vintage shoe stretcher on a weathered dresser.

Special thanks to all of the people who took the time to answer my questions, including David Dolff, Samantha Cutrara, Tina Adcock, Sarah Van Vugt, Danielle Lorenz, Catherine Ulmer, Michelle-Kelly Hogan, Tarisa Dawn Little, Gillian Leitch, Krista McCracken, Claire Campbell, Maddie Knickerbocker, Wendy McElroy, Carol Lynn, Crystal Fraser, Ling Ling Ang, Anne Dance, Krystl Raven, Danielle Robinson, Vanessa McLeod, Shannon Stettner, Anne Marie Lane Jonah, Tarah Brookfield, Erin Millions, Aisha Wynter, Michelle Desveaux, Anne Janhunen, Mary Chaktsiris, Stephanie Pettigrew, Beth A. Robertson, Shirley Tillotson, Janis Thiessen, Linda Steer, Tracey Kinney, Blair Stein, Christine Corcos, Kesia Kvill, Jenny Leigh Smith, Katy Kole de Peralta, Elise Chenier, Caroline Durand, Laura Ishiguro, and Jennifer Hoyt. Extra special thanks to Sarah Van Vugt, Krystl Raven, Erin Millions, Kesia Kvill, Laura Ishiguro, Caroline Durand, and Krista McCracken for feedback on an earlier draft of this paper!

I recently put out a call on my Facebook page asking for recommendations for comfortable black dress shoes for someone who hates heels. Long story short, my old reliable black flats were dead, and the cobbler said they were too decrepit to even repair. Since I was going to be in Ottawa soon (more on this later), however, I needed to find something. I received a ton of awesome recommendations from friends of mine. They were so good in fact that I thought they deserved their own blog post.

When many of us first start teaching, clothing can be a fraught issue. We struggle to look professional while also still being comfortable. Lecturing involves a great deal more physical activity than many of us realize – standing on your feet for one to three hours takes its toll. Most classes also tend to be taught in older buildings, which don’t necessarily have air conditioning or heating, or even windows that open. So, in today’s blog post, I’m going to give you some great recommendations for teaching in comfort and style, from me and an awesome group of other educators. This isn’t necessarily a very original idea,  and there have even been some great blogs on the subject (RIP Academichic). However, most of these are American, and don’t really help us Canadians. Not only do we have different stores here, but Canadian classrooms have their own norms regarding dress. One important note: while most blog posts of this nature target women specifically (something I’ll deal with further on), I wanted to make sure that this specific post was inclusive of any and all genders. That is why I have divided it into clothing categories, rather than breaking things down by gender. And most importantly, while these are just some recommendations, I think it’s important to emphasize that you should wear what makes YOU feel comfortable and stylish. Enjoy!

As usual, one quick caveat: There continue to be significant variations by field and by country in what is considered appropriate dress. In my experience, Canada tends to be much more casual than the United States, particularly in the Humanities and Social Sciences. I can’t remember ever seeing a professor wearing a suit to class. For the most part, people tend to go with variations on business casual. Those in Fine Arts tend to have more leeway in terms of creativity, while those in Law tend to dress more conservatively in suits or dresses. However, this will of course vary from institution to institution, and depend to a large extent on campus culture.

Finally, as one commentator noted, in the vast majority of cases, it is important to remember that it is never ok to talk about another person’s body, appearance, or clothing choices, no matter the circumstances. Even well-intentioned and seemingly-innocent remarks can be problematic, misread, and can make folks feel uncomfortable. It is equally important not to police other people’s clothing choices according to what you feel is acceptable. We could all use a little more kindness in our world, and it’s always ok to compliment someone on a nice outfit. But it is also our responsibility to do the work necessary to make everyone feel included and safe. Or, in the immortal words of Etsy, be kind, be brave, and be strong.

 

Continue reading

Historians in Public

Note from Andrea: we have a very special blog post today, that is also being shared on Active History and Histories Engagée. This post was originally published in the “Word from the President” column in Intersections 1.3. Special thanks to Adele Perry, the CHA, and Jim Clifford for making this happen.

By Adele Perry

The CHA|SHC is one of the organizations involved with The|La Collaborative, a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council [SSHRC] of Canada-funded network dedicated to fostering Social Sciences and Humanities knowledge and skills in society at large.[1]  In part, this involves discussing and promoting a range of different ways of being a social science or humanities scholar outside of the formal academy: in elementary and secondary classrooms, in media both new and old, and wherever we might find opportunity and cause to demonstrate the capacity of scholarly practice.

What historians can contribute to this is a long and I think notable history of practising our scholarship in public. In 2010, Joy Parr explained that historical practice “attentive to contemporary concerns, engaged in policy and with an engaged citizenry has existed as long as historical scholarship has existed in Canada.”[2]  The causes, communities, and issues that historians engage with have changed, as have the tools and technologies that historians use to engage and communicate.  But the basic fact of historians’ willingness to connect their research to the present and to speak to communities beyond the archive and classroom is longstanding.

In the last decade, Canada’s historical community have seen a number of new initiatives that mobilize historical knowledge and expertise to contribute to wider discussions.  These are notable and worth discussing in a forum like Intersections unto themselves.  That these initiatives are significantly organized and maintained by junior scholars, many of whom who have done so without the resources of tenure-track or tenured appointments, should give us all additional pause.  As a profession, our capacity to engage robustly with wider conversations and publics is not threatened by scholarly disinterest as much as it is by a precarious condition that a generation of historians are compelled to navigate.

Continue reading

Remembrance Day Poppies: The Political History of a Symbol

Red poppies, and one white poppy, in a field.

This post was inspired by a suggestion from Tina Adcock, and without her support and encouragement, it probably would have remained unwritten. So I would like to send her a huge extra-special thank-you. I would also like to thank the individuals who read and commented on previous versions of this draft, including Tina Adcock, Andrew Nurse, Jon Weier, Chris Schultz, and Maj. (ret.) Peter Scales MA. A special thank-you goes to Christina Wakefield for supplying me with information about the 1921 Great War Veterans Association. Finally, many of the points raised in this blog post emerged out of online conversations about wearing poppies, both on Facebook and Twitter. I would like to thank everyone who participated for their contributions and for making this blog post much more nuanced.

 

A few weeks ago, the Royal British Legion posted a series of images designed to bust some prevalent myths about what poppies mean. One of the comments caught the attention of Tina Adcock and myself:

“Poppies are not pro-war, they are a symbol of respect for those who sacrificed everything for our safety. But not commemorating past wars would mean we don’t learn from history.”[1]

That is one hell of a loaded sentence, especially when we are still in the midst of Monument Wars. But it did make me start realizing that we don’t know very much about the poppy’s history as a symbol in Canada. Since I don’t like unanswered questions, I decided to dig a little bit deeper to see what I could find. In today’s blog post, we’re going to talk about what I uncovered, take a look at the history of the poppy, what it means to wear one, and how we learn from the past.

 

Continue reading

Being Jewish in Canada: Past and Present

Summer forest in the daytime, with the sun shining through among the trees.

 

Special thanks to Anne Dance, Tina Adcock, Stephanie Pettigrew, Lee Blanding, and especially Lynne Marks for their help with this piece.

Content Warning/Trigger Warning: antisemitism, racism, violence

In the wake of the mass shooting at the Tree of Life Synagogue in Pittsburgh on Saturday, I wrote a Twitter essay sharing some thoughts and feelings. To my surprise, it gained a lot of attention, and I am overwhelmed by the resulting outpouring of love and support. However, since Twitter isn’t an ideal medium for a nuanced discussion of history, I was also debating putting together a blog post. A number of individuals expressed interest in more information about the racial identity of Jews and the history of antisemitism[1]. There seems to be overwhelming support for this idea, so here we go. While I’ll be repeating a lot of what I’ve said already, if you want to see the original Twitter thread, just go here.

 

Continue reading

A Duty to Consult

Fallen fall leaves against a wooden deck.

 

Today we have a special guest post from Sarah York-Betram! She posted a version of this piece on her Instagram late last week, and was kind enough to transform it into a blog post.

 

Sarah York-BertramA scholar from Treaty Six Territory, Sarah York-Bertram is a Canadian historian and PhD candidate at York University specializing in the socio-legal histories of the Canadian Prairies in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.

 

In 2013, the Mikisew Cree First Nation challenged the Harper Government’s 2012 omnibus legislation on the grounds that the legislation could impact the First Nation’s constitutionally protected rights to hunt, trap, and fish in Treaty 8 territory. They argued that, as per their longstanding treaty rights, the Crown had a duty to consult them when contemplating actions or decisions that may affect their rights as Indigenous people and their treaty rights. The omnibus legislation made significant changes to the Fisheries Act, Species at Risk act, and the Navigable Waters act, reducing government oversight of lands and waters. Opposition to the omnibus legislation and the Harper government’s approach to relations with the Indigenous peoples sparked the Idle No More movement in 2012.

 

Continue reading

Historical Writing as a Creative Endeavour

Coloured pencils lined up against a white background

Note from Andrea: Due to some unforeseen problems, the blog post we were originally going to publish today has been delayed to next week. So we hope you enjoy this one instead!

Special thanks to Krista McCracken, Stephanie Pettigrew, and Catherine Ulmer for their help drafting this piece. And thanks to Heather Green, Samantha Cutrara, Stephanie Pettigrew, Sam McLean, Kesia Kvill, Maryanne Reed, Elizabeth Della Zazzera, Pam Calvert, Aisha Wynter, Stephanie Bangarth, Danielle Metcalfe-Chenail, Mary Chaktsiris, Gillian Leitch, Maxime Dagenais, and Dan Horner for answering my random questions!

One of the most common questions that people ask me, (besides how on earth I managed to do the roundup), is: how do you manage to write a new blog post every week? Usually I give my standard response: when you teach four courses a semester, you get really good at writing lectures fast. And a blog post is pretty much just a shorter lecture. But more recently, I’ve started to rethink my approach to writing history.

 

Continue reading

My latest Active History Post!

Hey wonderful people! I’ve got a brand new blog post up over at Active History this week, on the latest CAUT report on sessional instructors. Here’s a sneak peak:

On the day after Labour Day, the Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) released its long-awaited report from its first national survey of over 2,600 contract faculty who had taught at least one course in the 2016-2017 school year. The numbers, while unsurprising to many contract faculty, were quite shocking. And yet the release of the report has made barely a ripple. To date, there has only been one news article published on the report, from the Toronto Star.[1] Given the lack of news coverage, I would like to review some of the more significant findings, since they reveal major structural and systemic problems which impact faculty at all levels.

Don’t forget to read the rest of it over  here!

Fight or Flight: Bill 62, Masuma Khan, Nationalism, and History Education

A green glass cup is filled with colouring pencils in a variety of colours encompassing the rainbow. The pencil tips are slightly blunted, and the pencil look well-used.

I have to tell you, I had a really hard time figuring out what to write about this week. Between the current strike by college professors in Ontario, the attacks online against feminist and socially progressive scholars, and the latest insanity happening down south, there are so many current events emerging right now that it seemed impossible to figure out a place to start. But two not completely unrelated events stand out in my mind. The first is the passage of Bill 62 in my home province, and the other is the disciplinary action faced by Masuma Khan, a student at Dalhousie, for speaking out against Canada150 on Facebook. To my mind, these events have something important in common: they are both based around particular narratives of history and identity. So in today’s blog post, I’m going to talk about the events in question, imagined communities, the backfire effect, and why it is important that we teach history responsibly.

 

Continue reading

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Unwritten Histories

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑